“In the twentieth century, the end of foreign political invaders on India also came. The birth of independence also happened and at the very end of the twentieth century, the decline of democratic and constitutional values that were created also began.
The main reason for this is that the Supreme Court and other High Courts, instead of protecting constitutional values according to their own conscience and instead of giving justice to the people, used diplomacy on a large scale only to deliver verdicts, due to which the justice system of this country proved to be ineffective. (With a few minor exceptions.)
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar granted parliamentary democracy to our country through the Constitution. But the justice system failed to stop the interference of ruling political parties in the justice system. The best example of this is the Forty-Second Constitutional Amendment of 1976. Through this constitutional amendment, a blow was struck at the fundamental rights of the people in the Constitution.
During the period of Emergency, the fundamental rights of the people have no value at all. Even ordinary people understand this. But to make a constitutional amendment during that very period of Emergency, and that too to permanently remove the fundamental rights of the people…
In what morality does this fit?
First of all, there was no need for the Emergency – this Emergency was imposed on the country unnecessarily only due to the political ego of Indira Gandhi (because of Sanjay Gandhi’s virus).
One thing was good that the then Supreme Court had opposed this, saying that Parliament has the right to make constitutional amendments as per Article 368, but Parliament does not have the right to change the framework of constitutional values and the fundamental rights of the people…..
Because this right has been granted to the people by the Constituent Assembly, not by Parliament.
Therefore the conflict between Parliament and the Supreme Court continued for many years. Finally, when it was proved that fundamental rights cannot be removed, then going forward into the twenty-first century, RSS i.e. BJP started placing CJI in the Supreme Court and judges in the High Courts who were convenient to them and who would come in the way of this constitutional amendment. So that if in the future the fundamental rights of the people are removed in this twenty-first century, no one should come in the way.
But this much is certain that till the end of the twentieth century, the justice system kept its own (justice system’s) fundamental rights protected from the ruling political parties.
In the twenty-first century, however, the Supreme Court and all other High Courts could not stop this infiltration of ruling political parties into the justice system. Hundreds of examples can be given of this. But it is necessary to give some main examples. So I am giving them.
(1) In 2018, in the history of the Supreme Court, four judges of the Supreme Court — Hon. Justice Ranjan, Hon. Justice Chelameswar, Hon. Justice Madan Lokur and Hon. Justice Kurian Joseph — had held a press conference to make the people aware that the constitutional framework was crumbling, in an effort to awaken the people’s constitutional consciousness.
(2) While there is a rule in the Constitution that no judge of any High Court or the Supreme Court can take any position of benefit after retirement, was it not because Modi/Shah offered Rajya Sabha membership to this very Ranjan Gogoi (who was one of those four judges) that the matter of those four judges ended the very next day…!
And Ranjan Gogoi became a Rajya Sabha member as soon as he retired…..!
(3) Despite thousands of complaints with evidence of EVM fraud against the Chief Election Commission coming in, many CJIs of the Supreme Court showed those complaints the dustbin.
(4) Prime Minister Modi, breaking protocol, goes to the official residence of CJI Dhananjay Chandrachud for Ganpati aarti. Even the judge does not feel anything about this. On the contrary, he makes a statement that, while delivering justice in any case, God himself helps me!…
(5) Without any reason, the former CJI Bhushan Gavai himself first proposed the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes in the Supreme Court and it was also passed by a majority of four against one. Did the Supreme Court seem like Parliament?…..
A proposal has to be placed in Parliament, a law is passed in Parliament — there is not even that much sense. Shoes are thrown at you. Still the stance of “Master, I am of your own pair of shoes!”…
Your own birth-giving mother had requested that remove this EVM, but your RSS people are bigger than your mother, aren’t they!…
(6) The real estate of this country means the youth generation of this country, who is educated but unemployed. You, the current CJI Suryakant, address that youth generation who will build future India as Cockroach!…
So many such examples can be given…….
But, against the anti-constitutional stance of the CJI in the Supreme Court of the twenty-first century as well as the judges of other High Courts, in the coming times we the people’s court, which is at the supreme position for us, will not refrain from taking to the streets for its awakening.
Because this Constitution is only and only for we the people of India, not for anyone else. That is why this is a series of articles of ideological expression for the awakening for plowing this land.
Note :- This ideological article series is a continuously running one. Therefore, it is the duty of every person as a responsible Indian citizen to make it viral as much as possible.
